<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forever Saying This Right Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenyonfarrow.com/2005/06/13/forever-saying-this-right-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenyonfarrow.com/2005/06/13/forever-saying-this-right-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://kenyonfarrow.com/2005/06/13/forever-saying-this-right-now/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenyonfarrow.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/forever-saying-this-right-now/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Kenyon,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I didn&#039;t interpret your essay as &quot;fuck off&quot; - I actually thought you were trying to float ideas out there for consumption and dialogue and my responses have tried to take those ideas seriously even when I had reservations about the tone. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Whether you have an interest in &quot;building&quot; or not is besides the point here. Whether you like it or not, by continuing to discuss these things in public forums, we&#039;ve both taken our own steps to build a build a dialogue (however antagonistically or not) and I&#039;d like to think the conversation that exists actually has constructive elements to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenyon,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t interpret your essay as &#8220;fuck off&#8221; &#8211; I actually thought you were trying to float ideas out there for consumption and dialogue and my responses have tried to take those ideas seriously even when I had reservations about the tone. </p>
<p>Whether you have an interest in &#8220;building&#8221; or not is besides the point here. Whether you like it or not, by continuing to discuss these things in public forums, we&#8217;ve both taken our own steps to build a build a dialogue (however antagonistically or not) and I&#8217;d like to think the conversation that exists actually has constructive elements to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

