Monthly Archives: July 2006

Goodbye, Rickey Williams

I just finished reading James Baldwin’s Another Country. The book was published in 1962, and focused on (I think) how anti-black racism makes love (between blacks & whites, and blacks & blacks) a difficult proposition, if not impossible.

The book (basically) opens with Rufus Scott, a young black jazz musician, attempting to come to terms with what his life has become. Unable to cope, on a cold night he (in a macabre and beautifully written passage) walks to the middle of the George Washington Bridge, and plunges himself into the “black” water of the Hudson River.

This must have been an extremely scandalous thing for Baldwin to write in 1962. For their was the notion, which some of us still believe, that black people don’t commit suicide. This, in spite of the fact that Baldwin got the idea for this character, upon reading a newspaper report f a former black male lover’s suicide, executed in the same fashion. [NOTE FROM KAZEMBE: Rufus Scott's suicide in Another Country was inspired by a person that Baldwin was in love with, Eugene Rivers. Rivers committed suicide after professing a love for Baldwin. The incident haunted Baldwin for a number of years.Baldwin too attempted suicide, after being jailed in Paris for "stealing" (He took a sheet from one hostel to another) Fortunately, the rope broke.]

A week ago, black gay activist Rickey Williams jumped from the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. I didn’t know Rickey, but learned about this first from Keith Boykin’s blog. [NOTE: I have subsequently learned he was only 28, and was friends of several other brothers I love and respect-- Frank Roberts, Tim'm West, Marlon Bailey.] But I am still concerned, affected in some way, by his death. As another Black gay man, I can certainly understand the type of alienation one can feel from one’s self, one’s community, and sometimes the whole damn world. As an “activist/community organizer,” I also know that while one’s work is often trying to build a sense of community-and to attempt to inspire the conditions that create alternative ways of being in the world, new ways of relating to each other-it is often a lonely endeavor. I have often felt that many of us who do this work are often the most alienated.

But specfic to the Black LGBT community, I urge us to work hard to try to create community. I live in a neighborhood that as a Black gay man, I don’t feel particularly safe in. Whilst I am lucky that because my boyfirend has lived here for over 5 years (and has close relationships with lots of people in the community), and I have gotten to know alot of people in the community (both straight and otherwise), I see LGBT folks in the community all the time who I don’t know, and have made no attempt to get to know, and they haven’t tried to get to know me either. With all of the violence (and murder) happening to us in NYC (and dare I say, every other major city in the US), we can’t really afford to live in isolation from one another.

In my personal circles, and with my work, I continue to urge us, particularly Black gay men and transgendered women, to really interrogate the culture of shade. Where does it come from? What is the impetus to cut each other down so quickly, and with such venomous ferocity? I know we come from communities (esp African-American) with a tradition of playing the dozens, but is it more harmful for the most oppressed members of the community? Is it a form of shaming? Is it kidding? All the time? When do we get to show care for one another? Me’shell Ndegeocello, in the song Dead Nigga Blvd said “I can’t even tell my brothas and sistas that they fine/this absense of beauty in the heart and mind…”

I don’t know if any of this woud have saved Rickey. People make the choice to end their lives for all sorts of reasons. But I do know, if we took better care of one another (whether white folks, or quite frankly, the larger Black community does or does not embrace us), his time here may have been a little easier.

And so would mine.

And so would yours.

Beyond Marriage. Gay or Otherwise.

Today the State of Washington ruled that the state’s “defense of marriage act” did not violate the state constitution. Many people will try to compare the ruling to the recent NY ruling, but they are really dissimilar.

The only comparisons to be made between the two is that both courts agreed that it was up to legislatures of those two states to change the laws governing marriage. But that is about the end of the

The New York State ruling was really very mean spirited. It basically statted that because heterosexual (well, at least 1man/1woman households) were in such state of disarray that the state thought to allow same-sex marriage would be to further undermine a crimbling institution, and we should be doing more to support (presumably) hetero marriages.

The state of Washington’s ruling was much more nuanced a decision. It read:

“In reaching this conclusion, we have engaged in an exhaustive constitutional inquiry and have deferred to the legislative branch as required by our tri-partite form of government. Our decision accords with the substantial weight of authority from courts considering similar constitutional claims. We see no reason, however, why the legislature or the people acting through the initiative process would be foreclosed from extending the right to marry to gay and lesbian couples in Washington.” Read the full decision here. Read the press release here.

Now many of you who have read “Is Gay Marriage Anti-Black?” are probably wondering, “Why the hell do you care about this?”

I guess that’s fair. My answer is twofold. While I personally do not care to get married, and have my own opinions about it as an institution, I do make a distinction between that and homophobic legislation. The other thing is, I am in full support of people being able to define their relationships and families for themselves, and people being able to have some sort of reciprocal benefits to determine beneficiaries, hospital visits, power-of-attorney, etc., without having to be married, or without the relationship needing to be monogamous, or even romantic or sexual.

It is for this reason last April I accepted an invitation to work with a group of LGBTQ(etc.) who had been writing, speaking, or organizing around the marriage issue (or critiquing the institution itself). We spent the weekend offering our thoughts, critiques, vision and strat and working towards a broader more inclusive vision of what work around domestic partner/civil union/reciprocal benefits/marriage work could look like that would move us toward a vision of, well, justice. The fruits of our labor have just been released into the world-with a statement of that vision, some strategy for folks in the marriage movement, and a place for individuals & organizations to sign on to that vision. The website is Beyond Marriage. I welcome your thoughts and feedback, as we see this document not as a complete, finite thing, but a living breathing document for people to use in whatever way makes sense, in whatever communities they wish to use it.

This was important for me, who people often accuse (and sometimes rightfully so) of being full of critique but offering no solutions. Sometimes I don’t think there is a solution (not an easy one, anyhow) to many of the issues I write/lecture about, but I think I can stand behind the spirit of this work.

So go read, forward it to friends, post the LINK on your blog(s), and get back to me.

Mo'Nique's Crime: Flying While Black


My sister called me yesterday and told me she heard actress and comedian Mo’Nique talking on the Steve Harvey Morning Radio Show about a harrowing incident on United Airlines, where she was ultimately asked to leave the plane. She describes the incident as racist, and is calling for her fans to boycott the airline itself.

I found a link to the story on New York Daily News (who is making headlines itself as the paper featured in the new Bravo reality Show, Tabloid Wars.)

Gross Men Groping.

One of the problems of the Left in the US is that they can’t get past the rhetoric of hating on Bush. So without being able to articulate a poltical/social/economic agenda that extends beyond just being opposed to Bush or Republicans(which suggests that the Left (liberals in particular), don’t really disagree with Bush doctrine, they just don’t liike the fact that he (and his administration) is disinterested in engaging them in the performance of “negotiation.”

But since I blogged a last week about the racial/sexual/poltical dynamics of touching, in that case Barbara Walters tugging at R&B star Brandy’s hair while asking “is it real?” I saw this news story about Bush that I thought was appropriate to blog about.

Bush recently came under fire for massaging German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She looked completely horrified, so there was no doubt it was unwanted. What’s interesting this video, is that it gives you a window into the modus operandi of someone who is normally so guarded in front of media. It’s quite skeevy, because it appears (to me, anyhow) that this is how he always comports himself around women. It makes me feel like exactly how she looks to react to it…”ICK!!!!” I don’t think that most men understand how it feels to be groped by someone you have not given consent to be groped by.

But gay men I think experience that to some extent. Sometimes it happens with other gay men in gay establishments. For me, as a Black gay man, I am almost always groped by white men. A few years ago, I used to love going to the Wonder Bar, in New York’s East Village. It was racially mixed space for the most part, but I went primarily because I loved DJ Sharee, who was the resident weekend DJ for many years. She, in a nutshell, seemed to show up for work with my music collection in tow.

In any case, I remember once complaining to a white gay friend that men there always grabbed my crotch, or squeezed my ass. He replied, “That never happens to me.”

It wasn’t that he wasn’t approached be men interested in him sexually, but they didn’t feel empowered to fondle him the way they would me, or likely dozens of other men of color who frequented the bar. It was shortly after this point that I realized the racial/sexual dynamics of this space. It dawned on me that after nearly 5 years of being a regular at this bar, that of the scores of men that approached me, only two were men of color (both Black) ever approached me. By the same token, only one or two ever repsonded to me, while the rest looked on with indifference or outright indignance. If the space existed, or had come to exist, to be a place where white (mostly European) men could pick up artsy/bohemian Black, Latino, Asian men (if they wanted “homothugs” or whatnot, they were to be found in The Warehouse, Escuelita, or The Hangar). Therefore, it was perfectly acceptable for them to grope me. If that was the name of the game, I was supposed to be honored they wanted to play it.

But gay men also get groped during childhood. If we are perceived to be gay as children or move through the world in ways that are gendered “feminine” we are often subjected to groping, fondling, and sometimes sexual assault that women and girls are subjected to, as a tool of domination.

One would think that these dynamics would change how many gay men, of whatever race, then respond to women and women’s bodies. I have seen many gay men grope women’s breasts or ass (and had women friend complain of this this behavior from gay men.) as if because they (supposedly) aren’t sexually aroused by women’s bodies, that that makes it OK for them to grope women in ways that are inappropriate for a man who is sexually attracted to, and/or sexually active with, women.

Whether at the gay bar, on an entertainment talk show (which accrding to reports, was essentially Barbara interviewing Brandy for Star Jones’ job. Can you imagine a potential employer putting their hands on you, in your hair, on a job interview!?) , or at an international meeting of heads of state, dominator culture-and subjugation via physical/sexual contact based on race & gender, is ever present, and ever at play.

New Blogs to Watch Out For!


There are too many blogs. At least more than I can keep up with. There are a few I read because of my 9-5, and a few I read for my own pleasure. I have recently stumbled across three new blogs that I am really excited about, and I think you shoud know about them.

Kazembe Balagun, another fellow radical Black Gay Writer, has just launched a new blog, Black Man With A Library. Kazembe writes that he started this blog to “highlight grassroots scholarship and research.” He also plans to reveiw new books as well as classics, and post all writings from Left Turn and NYC Indypendent. Get into it.

The second blog I want to feature is also a podcast, coming from Los Angeles called Pink Mafia Radio. Damn! I hate when people do projects I wanna do (hey Kaz! Maybe we should do our own damn Black Queer Radical podcast!) first! Anyhow, I haven’t listened to the podcast yet, but as soon as I do, I’ll tell you how it goes…In the meantime, get into Pink Mafia Radio.

Lastly, but certainly not least, a Lebanese musician/artist named Mazen Kerbaj in Beirut Lebanon began blogging two days before the Iraeli Bombardment of Lebanaon. He has been detailing the experience, mostly through a series of illustrations. Get into Kerblog.

The Family Stand Returns

Whenever I think I have had it with New York for the last time, summer arrives. Somehow, I figure out some way to make it through another year in this city-save the year I actually DID leave!

But summer has become just about the only reason to live in NYC as far as I’m concerned. There are so many hotties here - boys and girls in NYC really like to show it off when the weather breaks, too! It’s all about the grown and sexy. It’s also all about the Sunday brunches. The mimosas and the mojitos. The rooftop barbecues.

But most importantly, it’s also about the free live music. Between Prospect Park, Wingate Park, South Street Seaport Festival, SummerStage, you more than get your fill of some really great music and performances.

This past Saturday, you could have found me perched next to three of my best girlfriends for The Family Stand show at Central Park’s SummerStage.

Many of you (if you’d quit lyin’ about your age) will remember the Family Stand as the group behind the R&B hit single Ghetto Heaven. But oh, are they so much more. One of the founding members of the Black Rock Coalition, The Family Stand helped to set the standard for Black music that was deeply rooted in Black American music and expressive culture, but also was unafraid of pushing the limits of those popular forms of rock, blues, jazz and soul, or combining elements of each to create something new, but strangely familiar.

The band-V. Jeffrey Smith, Peter Lord and Sandra St. Victor, recorded three albums together as a group in the late 1980s/early 1990s, before disbanding and working on separate projects. Smith & Lord went on to work with many artists like Des’ree and Will Downing, before producing a fourth Family Stand recording in the late 1990′s without Sandra.

Not my favorite record.

On the other hand, St. Victor recorded two brilliant CDs during this period - Mack Diva Saves the World(1996), and Gemini: Both Sides (2001), before moving to Amsterdam.

But the group never broke up, really, as they continued to collaborate when they weren’t recording as The Family Stand. But on Saturday, the group played through a tight ass set of new tracks from their upcoming 4th (or 5th) studio recording, Super Sol Nova. They were amazing, and what also makes this band rare, is that all three members can sing their asses off. But be clear, Sandra St. Victor is the standout vocalist. The only thing I missed from this show were some songs from Sandra’s solo records — Move Me, They’re Cool, or Mack Diva would have sent me over the edge.

The only other problem was SummerStage’s inept sound technicians, who didn’t seem to know that when a person’s mouth is moving (or an intrument is playing) and they’re no noise, it means a mic needs to be turned on or up. Alexa, get some new sound techs, please!

In any case, check them out if you can soon, and be sure to pick up the disc when it drops.

LIFEBeat Called to Answer for Hiring Homophobic Artists for AIDS Benefit

LIFEBeat, the organization that works with musicians to raise public awareness to HIV/AIDS, hired two Jamaican dancehall artists-Beenie Man and Tok- for a July 18th NYC benefit concert that is specifically attempting to raise awareness of HIV/AIDS among people of Caribbean descent, who currently make up the majority of people of African descent here in NYC. Many Black LGBT New Yorkers are mobilizing against this concert, as they see it as a slap in the face, an HIV/AIDS organization would hire two artists that have recorded and performed songs about killing gay men & lynching lesbians, would then be called upon to perform at an HIV/AIDS awareness benefit concert. An organization, that also has gay members of the Board of Directors.

Led by Keith Boykin, many Black gay & lesbian bloggers have joined together in an online campaign to force LIFEBeat to cancel the appearances of those two artists. It’s actually very refreshing to see Black Lesbian & Gay folks mobilizing over an important issue, and exerting their power to see change, especially when it is not the result of yet another bashing or murder. Keith had tried to engage the LIFEBeat Executive Director John Cannelli on this issue, and he was met with an acknowledgement of the contradiction, but he simply refused to do anything about it. So the new coalition, Black LGBT Bloggers Against Anti-Gay Musicians are calling for them to shut down the show.

So, what do I think? While I support the initiative of LIFEBeat to try to raise public awareness of HIV/AIDS within the Caribbean community, I think it is so fucked up that LifeBeat would hire these artists (I think most people forget most artists still get paid their rate for benefits-they probably aren’t donating their time), when there are other prominent artists they could have gotten to attract the same community they are trying to reach who aren’t (at least) so vocally homophobic. And can we add sexist? If we also consider the HIV/AIDS epidemic and Black women (and the way Black women are treated in their videos) in the US and in the Caribbean, this choice of artist seems doubly problematic. Does LIFEBeat not see a connection between homophobic & misogynistic violence as part and parcel of the HIV/AIDS pandemic?

Do I think the artists should be barred from the show? I am trying to decide if this could be an opportunity to engage those artists around some of these issues—but it’s not like they are unfamiliar with the critique, so I highly doubt it. Do they really care, or is this another way to get paid and look good without any real commitment to the issue? Do we shut down the event? What happens to the potential $$ raised, or the potential people who would have been reached with the HIV prevention messages (which I think are often problematic in and of themselves) as concert-goers?

The final analysis is fuck LifeBeat. And I don’t really care if they raise $$ for their music program (The proceeds donated are to benefit their Hearts & Voices Project) . While I think that there are Black LGBT folks raising the stink this time is good, I also want some weigh-in from Black folks of Caribbean descent specifically to also be able to decide how they think the issue should be addressed. I think that the homophobic dancehall does impact Black LGBT folks born in America-African-Americans listen to and purchase dancehall music and I have been threatened with the phrases “batty man” and “chi-chi man” several times in NYC, but I think we also have to be conscious of not mirroring the bahavior and narratives of some of the white protests in the UK of Dancehall, and not use those same narratives, that further paint the Caribbean (and Jamaicans, specifically) as some cesspool of violence or “backwards.” It is helpful to have converrsations about the nuances of how we language our concerns, or what we strategically ask for in the process.

I also hope that we also mobilize to protest hip-hop artists like Ice Cube, 50 Cent, Dead Prez and Busta Rhymes (who assaulted a gay fan for touching him in South Beach this past March) when they turn up for performances at benefits or otherwise.

But thats an aside.

There is some conversations happening amongst Black LGBT Caribbean folks (both in the US and in the Caribbean) who are demanding that the $$$ should go to support some Caribbean based work like J-Flag. Would this also work for you?

So, I will leave you with the contact information of LIFEBeat execs, and you can choose to tell them what you want them to do:

Write your own letter to LIFEbeat:
LIFEbeat, Inc.
630 Ninth Avenue (between 44th and 45th Streets)Suite 1010
New York, NY 10036http://www.lifebeat.org/
Telephone: 212.459.2590
Toll-free: 800.AIDS.411
Fax: 212.459.2892
John Cannelli, Executive Director, x101, http://us.f325.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=jcannelli@lifebeat.org
Sarah Peters Manager, Operations, x119, http://us.f325.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=speters@lifebeat.org

The View Harasses Brandy

It seems as though without one Black woman on board to keep them in check, the women of The View don’t know personal space, boundaries or simple codes of behavior.

Apparently R&B star Brandy was on the show, and rumor has it her two appearances as co-host fo the past week were a kind of an on-air interview, as a possible replacement for Star Jones. This may be true, but upon watching, I was appalled at the manner in which Barbara Walters, Joy Behar and Elizabeth Hasselbeck asked Brandy any and all kind of inappropriate questions. The worst moment was when Barbara asked Brandy if her hair was real, and at the same time, stuck her hand up in Brandy’s hair.

Is she crazy?

The producer must have whispered something in their earpieces, or perhaps they notcied how uncomfortable they were making Brandy (though I doubt they were that self-observant), because they backed off en masse and began to make jokes about how poorly they were behaving towards their guest. Joy Behar, then responded that perhaps that that was why they were dwindling in numbers.

This shit reminds me of being in prep school/college/at work with white people who have not learned that Black people are not dolls, toys, or animals — there to entertain them.

Don’t beleive me? Watch the video:

Rappers Battle Oprah. Why?

This needs no further introduction. Just read it.

We Still Wear The Mask By
Dr.William Jelani Cobb

This essay originally appeared on Playahata.com.

We could have known that it would come to this way back in 1896. That was the year that Paul Lawrence Dunbar dropped a jewel for the ages, telling the world that “we wear the mask that grins and lies.” The poet’s point was that beneath the camouflage of subservient smiles, black folks of the Jim Crow era were hiding a powder keg of other emotions, waiting patiently for the chance to detonate. The thing is, Dunbar never got the chance to spit bars with 50 Cent or throw in a guest collabo on a Mobb Deep album. If he had, then he would’ve known that grins and lies were only half the story.

These days, camouflage is the new black. Glance at hip hop for less than a second and it becomes clear that the music operates on a single hope: that if the world mistakes kindness for weakness it can also be led to confuse meanness with strength. That principle explains why there is a permanent reverence for the thug within the music; it is why there is a murderer’s grit and a jailhouse tat peering back at you from the cover of damn near any CD you picked up in the last five years. But what hip hop can’t tell you, the secret that it would just as soon take to its deathbed is that it this urban bravado is a guise, a mask, a head-fake to shake the reality of fear and powerlessness in America. Hip hop will never admit that our assorted thugs and gangstas are not the unbowed symbol of resistance to marginalization, but the most complacent and passive products of it.

We wear the mask that scowls and lies.

You could see which way the wind was blowing way in the early 90s when Dr. Dre was being ripped off by white Ruthless Records CEO Jerry Heller, and nonetheless got his street cred up by punching and kicking
Dee Barnes, a black woman journalist, down a flight of stairs. In this light, hip hop’s obsessive misogyny makes a whole lot more sense. It is literally the logic of domestic violence. A man is abused by a larger society, but there are consequences to striking back at the source of his problems. So he transfers his anger to an acceptable outlet – the women and children in his own household, and by extension, all the black people who constitute his own community.

Nothing better illustrates that point than the recent Oprah Debacle. Prior to last month, if you’d heard that a group of rappers had teamed up to attack a billionaire media mogul you would think that hip hop had finally produced a moment of collective pride on par with the black power fists of the 1968 Olympics. But nay, just more blackface.

In the past two months, artists as diverse as Ludacris, 50 Cent and Ice Cube have attacked Oprah Winfrey for her alleged disdain for hip hop. It’s is a sad but entirely predictable irony that the one instance in which hip hop’s reigning alpha males summon the testicular fortitude to challenge someone more powerful and wealthy than they are, they choose to go after a black woman.

The whole set up was an echo of some bad history. Two centuries ago, professional boxing got its start in America with white slaveholders who pitted their largest slaves against those from competing plantations. Tom Molineaux. First black heavyweight champion came up through the ranks breaking the bones of other slaves and making white men rich. After he’d broken enough of them, he was given his freedom. The underlying ethic was clear: an attack on the system that has made a slave of you will cost you your life, but an attack on another black person might just be the road to emancipation.

The basis for this latest bout of black-on-black pugilism was Oprah’s purported stiff-arming of Ludacris during an appearance on her show with the cast of the film Crash. Ludacris later complained that the host had made an issue of lyrics she saw as misogynistic. Cube jumped into the act whining that Oprah has had all manner of racist flotsam on her show but has never invited him to appear – proof, in his mind, that she has an irrational contempt for hip hop. Then 50 threw in his two cents with a claim that Oprah’s criticism of hip hop was an
attempt to win points with her largely white, middle class audience. All told, she was charged her with that most heinous of hip hop’s felonies: hateration.

But before we press charges, isn’t 50 the same character who openly expressed his love for GW Bush as a fellow “gangsta” and demanded that the black community stop criticizing how he handled Hurricane Katrina?

Compare that to multiple millions that Oprah has disseminated to our communities (including building homes for the Katrina families, financing HIV prevention in South Africa and that $5 million she dropped on Morehouse College alone) and the idea of an ex-crack dealer challenging her commitment to black folk becomes even more surreal.

In spite of – or, actually, as a result of — his impeccable gangsta credentials, 50 basically curtsied before a President who stayed on vacation for three days while black bodies floated down the New Orleans streets. No wonder it took a middle-class preppie with an African name and no criminal record to man-up and tell the whole world that “George Bush don’t care about black folks.” No wonder David Banner – a rapper who is just a few credits short of a Master’s Degree in social work — spearheaded hip hop’s Katrina relief concerts, not any of his thug counterparts who are eternally shouting out the hoods they allegedly love.

The 50 Cent, whose music is a panoramic vision on black-on-black homicide, and who went after crosstown rival Ja Rule with the vengeance of a dictator killing off a hated ethnic minority did everything but tap dance when Reebok told him to dismantle his porn production company or lose his lucrative sneaker endorsement deal.

But why single out 50? Hip hop at-large was conspicuously silent when Bush press secretary Tony Snow (a rapper’s alias if ever there was one) assaulted hip hop in terms way more inflammatory than Oprah’s mild request: “Take a look at the idiotic culture of hip-hop and whaddya have? You have people glorifying failure. You have a bunch of gold-toothed hot dogs become millionaires by running around and telling everybody else that they oughtta be miserable failures and if they’re really lucky maybe they can get gunned down in a diner sometime, like Eminem’s old running mate.”

(We’re still awaiting an outraged response from the thug community for that one.) Rush Limbaugh has blamed hip hop for everything short of the Avian flu but I can’t recall a single hip hop artist who has gone after him lyrically, publicly or physically. Are we seeing a theme yet?

It’s worth noting that Ludacris did not devote as much energy to Bill O’Reilly — who attacked his music on his show regularly and caused him to lose a multi-million dollar Pepsi endorsement – as he did to criticizing Oprah who simply stated that she was tired of hip hop’s misogyny. Luda was content to diss O’Reilly on his next record and go about his business. Anyone who heard the interview that Oprah gave on Power 105.1 in New York knew she was speaking for a whole generation of hip hop heads when she said that she loved the music, but she wanted the artists to exercise some responsibility. But this response is not really about Oprah, or ultimately about hip hop, either. It is about black men once again choosing a black woman as the safest target for their aggression and even one with a billion dollars is still fair game.

Of all their claims, the charge that Oprah sold out to win points with her white audience is the most tragically laughable. The truth is that her audience’s white middle-class kids exert waaay more influence over 50 and Cube than their parents do over Oprah. I long ago tired of Cube, a thirty-
something successful director, entrepreneur and married father of three children making records about his aged recollections of a thug’s life. The gangsta theme went cliché eons ago, but Cube, 50 and a whole array of their musical peers lack either the freedom or the vision to talk about any broader element of our lives. The reality is that the major labels and their majority white fan base will not accept anything else from them.

And there we have it again: more masks, more lies.

It is not coincidental that hip hop has made Ni@$a the most common noun in popular music but you have almost never heard any certified thug utter the word cracker, ofay, honky, peckerwood, wop, dago, guinea, kike or any other white-oriented epithet. The reason for that is simple: Massa ain’t havin’ it. The word fag, once a commonplace derisive in the music has all but disappeared from hip hop’s vocabulary. (Yes, these thugs fear the backlash from white gays too.) And bitch is still allowed with the common understanding that the term is referring to black women. The point is this: debasement of black communities is entirely acceptable – required even – by hip hop’s predominantly white consumer base.

We have lived enough history to know better by now – to know that gangsta is Sonny Liston, the thug icon of his era, threatening to kill Cassius Clay but completely impotent when it came to demanding that his white handlers stop stealing his money. Gangsta is the black men at the Parchman Farm prison in Mississippi who beat the civil rights workers Fannie Lou Hamer and Annell Ponder into bloody unconsciousness because their white wardens told them to. Gangsta is Michael Irvin, NFL bad boy remaining conspicuously mute on Monday Night Football while Limbaugh dissed Donovan McNabb as an Affirmative Action athlete. Gangsta is Bigger Thomas with dilated pupils and every other sweaty-palmed black boy who saw method acting and an attitude as his ticket out of the ghetto.

Surely our ancestors’ struggles were about more than creating millionaires who could care less about us and then tolerating their violent disrespect out of a hunger for black success stories. Surely we are not so desperate for heroes that we uphold cardboard icons because they throw good glare. There’s more required than that. The weight of history demands more than simply this. Surely we understand that these men are acting out an age-old script. Taking the Tom Molineaux route. Spitting in the wind and breaking black bones. Hoping to become free.

Or, at least a well-paid slave.
geovisit();